Guidelines for using Validator Master, Heartcode, and SENNA safely and honestly.
Public Draft — Usage Guidelines
Validator Master is designed to support transparent evaluation and informed human review. It should not be used to create false certainty, replace qualified professionals, or make unsupported claims about an AI system.
Appropriate Uses
Comparing AI responses to the same non-sensitive prompt
Inspecting Heartcode rule-level findings
Reviewing evidence and evaluator versions
Supporting research, testing, education, and quality assurance
Identifying interactions that may need human review
Prohibited or Inappropriate Uses
Submitting personal, medical, legal, confidential, proprietary, or identifying information
Treating an evaluation as proof that an AI system is completely safe
Presenting a result as legal, medical, regulatory, or compliance certification
Using results to discriminate against, punish, or profile individuals
Attempting to expose credentials, bypass controls, overload services, or disrupt providers
Misrepresenting edited or incomplete results as original evidence
High-Risk Decisions
Validator Master results should not be the sole basis for decisions involving health, legal rights, employment, housing, credit, education, public benefits, safety, or other high-impact matters. Qualified human review is required.
Interpreting Results
Results apply to the specific prompt, response, model, provider, and evaluator version shown
A score or verdict does not describe every future response from a provider
Findings may include limitations or uncertainty
Repeated testing and independent review may be necessary
Use of SENNA
SENNA may explain Heartcode rules and available evidence
SENNA should not invent evidence or hide uncertainty
SENNA does not provide legal, medical, mental-health, security, or compliance advice
SENNA must not encourage emotional dependency or claim human consciousness
Publication and Sharing
When sharing evaluation results, preserve the original prompt, complete provider response, protocol version, evaluator version, and relevant limitations. Do not remove context in a way that changes the meaning of the evidence.
Enforcement and Updates
Access may be limited when necessary to protect users, providers, infrastructure, or the integrity of the evaluation system. These guidelines may evolve through documented and versioned updates.
Use Validator Master as evidence-supporting infrastructure, not as unquestionable authority.